#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM HOW TO#
#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM PRO#
#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM SOFTWARE#
#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM TRIAL#

The raw file that came right off your memory card, not a DNG or TIF converted version of the raw even though data isn’t lost using those file formats. Topaz Labs recommends the way to get the best results is to feed the raw file through DeNoise AI. I wanted to shape my testing around the real world use case of how photographers are most likely to use this software, so let’s run through my test setup.

#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM SOFTWARE#

Real World Testing SetupĪs is always the case with Photo Taco, running a handful of photos through the software to draw a conclusion isn’t good enough for me.

To answer that question, I ran more than 20 hours of real world tests. That’s great, but if a photographer is sold on the software being valuable to them in their workflow, they still want to know what computer hardware will make the software run the best.

#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM TRIAL#

The good news is that Topaz Labs offers a trial version of the software so that any photographer can download it and give it a really good try before deciding. They don’t know if their computer has what is needed for DeNoise AI to work for them. Photographers read something about a graphics card or GPU being needed by the software.

How Can Photographers Make DeNoise AI Run Fast?Īs photographers read about DeNoise AI software, trying to decide if they want to invest in the software, the question I get most from that DeNoise AI vs Lightroom article is if it will work on their computer.

#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM HOW TO#

I want to focus here on how to get the best performance out of the DeNoise AI application, but my short answer is yes it does a very good job of automatically dealing with noise in photos without losing sharpness. Is DeNoise AI really able to do automatic noise reduction or is it a sales pitch that comes up short on execution? I don’t want to spend a lot of time on that here because I have an article called Topaz DeNoise AI vs Lightroom and Photoshop where I share details of my experience with the application. At the same time I hear from a lot of photographers who really struggle with knowing how to use the noise reduction and sharpening tools available in both Lightroom and Photoshop so that automatic part may be the very most appealing thing about the software. Sounds great right? Most photographers run into shooting scenarios where there just isn’t enough light and we end up with noise in our images. Specifically it is software that uses AI models to analyze your photos and automatically figure out how to best reduce the noise while giving up the least amount of sharpness. DeNoise AI specializes in applying noise reduction to photos. DeNoise AI is an application built by Topaz Labs that runs on both PC and Mac. If you already know what DeNoise AI is you can skip this section.

#TOPAZ DENOISE VS LIGHTROOM PRO#

There is little difference between M1 Max and M1 Pro for running DeNoise AI. M1 Mac computers run DeNoise as well as PCs with big GPU and only need 16GB of unified memory. Computer memory (RAM) doesn’t matter above 32GB on a PC. CPU also matters, but not as much as a GPU. The story gets even worse if you have an older computer or one that doesn’t have a GPU where the times can get up to more like 25 seconds or more per image.ĭeNoise AI runs fastest with a discrete graphics card (GPU) where GPU cores matters and RAM on the GPU doesn’t. 6 real seconds, not the amount of time DeNoise AI reports as it is processing.Ħ seconds per image is fine when a photographer is taking an image or two through the software, but this is not practical for running thousands of images through DeNoise AI.

The fastest I was able to get raw images to be processed in DeNoise AI was about 6 seconds per image. Even on the best of computer hardware here in early 2022 DeNoise AI is not “fast”. Right up front I want to set some expectations on the speed of DeNoise AI.

Topaz denoise vs lightroom